Grandpa Decides His Family Is A Bunch Of ‘Takers’, Leaves His Fortune To Someone Who ‘Deserved It More’

Elderly Man Leaves $770,000 to Non-Family Member, Igniting Legal Battle

In an unexpected turn of events, Ronald Butcher, a 75-year-old man, left his $770,000 estate to Daniel Sharp, a non-family member who had been a friend and helped him with household chores, including cleaning his gutters for free. Butcher’s family contested the will, claiming it did not represent his “true last wish.”

The Legal Dispute

Ronald Butcher passed away in his Enfield, England home, leaving behind a will that surprised many. His cousin, Joyce Gilkerson, and Evelyn Hutchins and Peter Rogers, the children of a close friend who called him “Uncle Ron,” challenged the will. They asked Judge Lesley Anderson QC to invalidate it and reinstate an earlier version that named them as beneficiaries.

The Surprising Beneficiary

Before changing his will, Butcher had evenly distributed his estate among his relatives. However, two months before his death, he amended his will to leave everything to Sharp, who was astonished by the inclusion and denied any involvement in influencing Butcher’s decision. Sharp had been friends with Butcher for six years.

Arguments in Court

Sharp’s lawyer argued that Butcher, who was lonely, found companionship in Sharp. They shared a love for DIY projects, and Butcher was fond of Sharp’s son. This relationship was cited as the reason for the 2013 will change. Despite not disputing Butcher’s sound mind at the time of the amendment, Hutchins’ lawyer, Araba Taylor, suggested that the “odd” modification should raise suspicion.

Family Testimonies

Hutchins and her brother claimed they maintained regular contact with Butcher, especially after their mother’s death, contradicting claims they had lost touch. Hutchins testified that they visited Butcher frequently, with one or the other seeing him every holiday break.

Sharp’s Gratitude

In court, Sharp expressed his gratitude for Butcher’s unexpected generosity. He recalled how Butcher had once offered him a small payment for cleaning his gutters, which he refused, seeing it as a simple, quick favor. He described the inheritance as “life-changing” and something he never expected.

Conclusion

The case highlights the complexities of wills and the emotional and legal battles that can ensue over inheritance. Whether the court upholds Butcher’s final wishes or reverts to the previous will remains to be seen, but it underscores the profound impact of personal relationships and acts of kindness on legacy decisions.